Tatsuya Dejima Official Site

[I want to eliminate war! I’ve written two papers on this topic]
I’ve written and published papers, along with simulation results, exploring whether it’s possible to eliminate four real-world conflicts by creating mathematical frameworks to eliminate war (beware of blind faith!).
While peace theories are important, I’ve devised an approach using my unique mathematical formulas and physical laws to forcibly control conflicting countries and organizations (please see this blog site for details). Here, I’ll explain the overview using language that the general public can understand.
■ Eleventh Paper: Mathematical Framework for Eliminating Conflict (Analysis of Conflict)
Until now, international politics has been a closed room of “one-on-one confrontations (2×2 matrix)” where country A and country B face each other directly. In this structure, there is no escape for mutual distrust and pride (conflict energy), and a massive explosion (war) occurs the moment it reaches its limit.
The mathematical framework I’ve devised to describe conflict views the world not as “points and lines,” but as interfering “waves.” Then, the overall system’s “rooms” are expanded to a “5×5 determinant” or even greater (multidimensionalization), and countless small alternative routes (mediating channels) such as “environmental disaster prevention,” “culture and art,” and “local exchange” are slipped into the gaps called off-diagonal components.

A familiar example is how the energy of a typhoon disperses and disappears into countless small vortices (dissipative structure). The collision energy that was concentrated on a specific line leaks out and diffuses into the newly added rooms, automatically reducing the overall danger level of the system as a physical necessity.

This doesn’t rely on the other party’s “goodwill or feelings.” Even in a marital relationship, if two people are glaring at each other in a small room, conflict arises, but if a “child” is introduced or another room like a “shared hobby (culture)” is added, the hostile energy escapes, and the overall tension decreases. This is the same mechanism of changing the shape of space.

■ Twelfth Paper: Results of Actual Simulations of Four Global Conflicts Using the Above Theory (Examples of Conflict Resolution Proposals)
This is a concrete result calculated by reverse engineering the mathematical formula from the ideal state of harmony (goal) and applying it to the actual international community using a computer.

1. Russia-Ukraine War
   Mathematical Approach: Cancellation of Opposite Phase (Absolute Distrust)
   Result: Countries with different frequencies, such as India, Brazil, and South Africa (Global South), are injected as mediators between two parties who hate each other and whose energy levels remain high. By colliding opposite waves, the aggressive waves of each party interfere and cancel each other out, like noise cancellation, spontaneously reducing the energy (tension) of the entire system.
2. Israel-Gaza-US Conflict
   Mathematical Approach: Decoupling of Distorted Integration and Injection of New Channels
   Result: Because the US is synchronized with Israel on the exact same wave (in phase), it does not act as a mediator, creating a distorted structure that creates a hellish loop. First, we will break this coupling and invite in a new “window”—a coalition of independent small states like Saudi Arabia, the UAE (United Arab Emirates), or Norway, free from Western bias. By cutting off the quagmire of insular conflict, we will transition to a state of peace.
3. The US-China Cold War
   Mathematical Approach: Reduce Military Coupling and Maximize Peripheral Networks
   Result: A macro structure where military conflict (opposite phase) and close economic ties (same phase) are intricately intertwined. Instead of reducing the coupling of military lines with a risk of direct conflict, we will maximize the coupling strength of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), on which both sides depend, and the global semiconductor supply chain network. This will absorb and disperse the conflict energy into surrounding networks, creating an untouchable dynamic harmony where “starting a war leads to self-destruction.”
4. Japan-China Relations
   Mathematical Approach: Expanding 2×2 Politics to a 5×5 Multi-Channel System
   Result: Due to their geographical proximity, confronting each other solely through a single line of political leadership (2×2) creates a highly delicate structure where a single spark can trigger a massive explosion. Therefore, by expanding the number of connections to 5×5, we introduce countless small channels—completely separate from politics—such as “joint Japan-China measures against yellow dust and PM2.5 (environmental disaster prevention),” “exchange of traditional arts (culture),” and “connections between local cities (local exchange).” The conflict energy dissipates into these numerous channels, naturally maintaining the most comfortable distance for neighboring countries.
   No matter how stubborn a dictatorship may be, if surrounded by this “unrejectable level of multidimensional network,” and its energy is smoothly absorbed from the outside, rebelling becomes physically costly and impossible.

The “art” and “culture” we have built are not merely ornaments, but the largest and most powerful “energy dispersive devices (dissipative structures)” that function to prevent the system from self-destructing.

The complete mathematical model, along with computer-verified simulation code, is included in the paper.

■Caution:
The above results are merely one example of the results from my paper. This is simply what happened when I created this idea and ran a simulation; please do not blindly believe that war can be eliminated. (Research requires incorporating feedback from many people and using dialectics to further refine this theory for practical use.)

https://zenodo.org/records/20702076

https://zenodo.org/records/20710879

上記より論文サイトからダウンロードできます。